This Article Full Text (OnlineFirst PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Donovan, H. S. Articles by Ward, S. E. PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Donovan, H. S. Articles by Ward, S. E. Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Nonspecific Effects in Psychoeducational Intervention Research

¹ University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing
² University of Wisconsin–Madison

^* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: kwekkeboom{at}wisc.edu.

	Abstract

Randomized clinical trials support the efficacy of a wide range of psychoeducational interventions. However, the mechanisms through which these interventions improve outcomes are not always clear. At times, the theoretically specified factors within interventions have been shown to have specific effects on patient outcomes. But it has also been argued that other factors not identified in the intervention theory (e.g., "nonspecific" factors such as patient expectations and therapeutic patient–clinician alliances) have powerful nonspecific effects that account for most, if not all, of the observed efficacy of psychoeducational interventions. This article describes important concepts in this debate and discusses key issues in distinguishing between specific and nonspecific effects of psychoeducational nursing interventions. Four examples are used to illustrate potential methods of identifying and controlling for nonspecific effects in clinical intervention trials.

First published on July 17, 2009
Western Journal of Nursing Research 2009, doi:10.1177/0193945909338488


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?