Western Journal of Nursing Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Register here to gain access to SAGE's 500+ Journals Online

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Orchard, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Orchard, C.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 16, No. 3, 317-331 (1994)
DOI: 10.1177/019394599401600307

Management of Clinical Failure in Canadian Nursing Programs

Carole Orchard

Nursing, Al Hada Armed Forces Hospital, Taif, Saudi Arabia

There has been growing concern raised by nurse educators regarding the potentialfor litigation by nursing students who are dissatisfied with educators' appraisal of these students' clinical performance. A descriptive survey using a cross-sectional design was used to assess the relationship between institutional policies and procedures related to student clinical evaluation practices. Population for this survey was diploma and basic baccalaureate nursing programs in Canada (N = 94). The response rate to this survey was 86.2% (81/94 programs). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Reliability of the instrument was assessed using contingency tables comparing the data obtained with the same program's written policies and procedures (p = .50). There were five significant findings: (a) a lack of faculty evaluation standards; (b) clinical instructors evaluating students alone; (c) the same members serving on more than one level of review; (d) lack of procedures when conducting informal and formal hearings; and (e) alteration of professional judgments of nurse faculty by nonnurses.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?