Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

The Diabetes Educator

SAGETRACK

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Western Journal of Nursing Research
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hoerst, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fairman, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hoerst, B. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fairman, J.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?

Social and Professional Influences of the Technology of Electronic Fetal Monitoring on Obstetrical Nursing

Barbara J. Hoerst

University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing, bhoerst{at}aol.com

Julie Fairman

University of Pennsylvania, School of Nursing

Electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) is one example of a biomedical technology that rapidly diffused from an experimental innovation into a standard medical practice. First developed in the 1950s, EFM became commercially available in the early 1970s and quickly transformed intrapartum obstetrical practice. Assessments and interventions, which practitioners had previously based primarily on laboring women’s subjective reports of bodily sensations, were now being based on quantifiable objective data from uterine activity and fetal heart rate transducers. Despite concerns of over-medicalization of the natural event of birth, iatrogenesis related to the increased incidence of operative deliveries, and escalating costs, EFM became widely accepted as routine and necessary by both practitioners and patients. By presenting the confident expectations and cautious reservations of various practitioners and patients to EFM, this article explores the rapid diffusion of EFM within the social context of the 1970s. A special focus is given to the perspective of intrapartum obstetrical nurses, because they have been the primary users of this perinatal technology since its introduction.

Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, 475-491 (2000)
DOI: 10.1177/01939450022044539
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?