Western Journal of Nursing Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rokosky, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Anderson, K. L.
Right arrow Articles by Rokosky, J. S.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 23, No. 1, 56-71 (2001)
DOI: 10.1177/01939450122044952

Evaluation of a Home Health Patient Classification Instrument

Kathryn L. Anderson

Seattle University School of Nursing

Joanne S. Rokosky

Health Care Financing Administration

The purpose of this study was to assess reliability and validity of the Revised Easley-Storfjell Patient Classification Instrument (R-ESPCI). Content validity was assessed by expert home health nurses. Interrater reliability was assessed by staff nurse ratings of patients on home visits (N = 34) and by chart review by the investigators (N = 30). Concurrent validity was also assessed. Percentage agreement for staff nurses was 36% (kappa = -.15) and 52% (kappa = .04) in two phases and for investigators 90% (kappa = .63) and 50% (kappa = .02) in two phases. Minimal support for concurrent validity was found. Content validity was established, but revised reimbursement policy eliminated less acutely ill patients, narrowing the acuity range. More discrete rating criteria or scoring changes may be needed, followed by further assessment of the R-ESPCI. Agency stability and adequate resources for staff training are required for additional testing of the instrument.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?