Western Journal of Nursing Research

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here for more information

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Musil, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Musil, C. M.
Right arrow Articles by Jones, S. L.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 24, No. 7, 815-829 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/019394502762477004

A Comparison of Imputation Techniques for Handling Missing Data

Carol M. Musil

Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio

Camille B. Warner

Frances Payne Bolton School of Nursing, and Department of Sociology, Case Western Reserve University

Piyanee Klainin Yobas

Department of Mental Health and Psychiatric Nursing, Mahidol University, Thailand

Susan L. Jones

College of Nursing, Kent State University, Ohio

Researchers are commonly faced with the problem of missing data. This article presents theoretical and empirical information for the selection and application of approaches for handling missing data on a single variable. An actual data set of 492 cases with no missing values was used to create a simulated yet realistic data set with missing at random (MAR) data. The authors compare and contrast five approaches (listwise deletion, mean substitution, simple regression, regression with an error term, and the expectation maximization [EM] algorithm) for dealing with missing data, and compare the effects of each method on descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients for the imputed data (n = 96) and the entire sample (n = 492) when imputed data are included. All methods had limitations, although our findings suggest that mean substitution was the least effective and that regression with an error term and the EM algorithm produced estimates closest to those of the original variables.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JBJSHome page
N. Jain, R. Pietrobon, S. Hocker, U. Guller, A. Shankar, and L. D. Higgins
The Relationship Between Surgeon and Hospital Volume and Outcomes for Shoulder Arthroplasty
J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., March 1, 2004; 86(3): 496 - 505.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]