This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Shapiro, S. E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Shapiro, S. E. Social Bookmarking                   What's this?

Evaluating Clinical Decision Rules

University of California, San Francisco Medical Center

Clinical decision rules (CDRs) are decision support tools that synthesize evidence into bedside tools for practice. Before adopting CDRs into practice, nurses must be assured that there is sufficient evidence in the literature that the rule performs as expected, can do so in a variety of settings (especially in settings similar to one’s own), and that using it will likely result in improved patient outcomes at no additional cost (or conversely, that it will lower costs with no adverse effect on clinical outcomes). This article provides a framework for clinical nurses to evaluate CDRs. The framework focuses on the processes used to establish the external validity of the rule, and the evidence that using the rule results in improved patient or systems outcomes, including cost-effectiveness. The Braden Scale is used as an example and is evaluated using the framework described.

Key Words: clinical decision rules • decision support tools

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S. E. Shapiro Guidelines for developing and testing clinical decision rules. West J Nurs Res, March 1, 2006; 28(2): 244 - 253. [Abstract] [PDF]