| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
A Comparison of Two Pain Measures for Asian American Cancer PatientsUniversity of Texas at Austin, 98shj98{at}gmail.com
University of Texas at Austin
University of Texas at Austin
University of Texas at Austin
University of Texas at Austin
Although two of the most commonly used multidimensional pain scales are the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (MPQ-SF) and the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), there has been little psychometric analysis of these tools used among ethnic minority populations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare psychometric properties of these two pain scales among 119 Asian American cancer patients. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients of the MPQ-SF and the BPI-SF were high (
Key Words: reliability and validity cancer pain Asian Americans cross-cultural
This version was published on August
1, 2007 Western Journal of Nursing Research, Vol. 29, No. 5,
545-560 (2007) |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
= .85-.97). The correlation coefficients of the item analyses were .12 to .88 for the MPQ-SF and .44 to .90 for the BPI-SF. Two factors were extracted for both instruments. Correlations between pain scores and the usage of pain medications were low for the MPQ-SF (r = .23-.33) and moderate for the BPI-SF (r = .40-.42). The results of this study indicated that, among Asian Americans, both the pain scales were internally consistent; some items in each instrument were redundant; and the BPI-SF is more valid than the MPQ-SF.