| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Western Journal of Nursing Research 2007;29:545. A more recent version of this article appeared on August 1, 2007 © 2007 SAGE Publications
A Comparison of Two Pain Measures for Asian American Cancer Patients
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: 98shj98{at}gmail.com.
=.85-.97). The correlation coefficients of the item analyses were .12 to .88 for the MPQ-SF and .44 to .90 for the BPI-SF. Two factors were extracted for both instruments. Correlations between pain scores and the usage of pain medications were low for the MPQ-SF (r =.23-.33) and moderate for the BPI-SF (r =.40-.42). The results of this study indicated that, among Asian Americans, both the pain scales were internally consistent; some items in each instrument were redundant; and the BPI-SF is more valid than the MPQ-SF.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

=.85-.97). The correlation coefficients of the item analyses were .12 to .88 for the MPQ-SF and .44 to .90 for the BPI-SF. Two factors were extracted for both instruments. Correlations between pain scores and the usage of pain medications were low for the MPQ-SF (r =.23-.33) and moderate for the BPI-SF (r =.40-.42). The results of this study indicated that, among Asian Americans, both the pain scales were internally consistent; some items in each instrument were redundant; and the BPI-SF is more valid than the MPQ-SF.