| Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools. |
Western Journal of Nursing Research 2008;30:181. A more recent version of this article appeared on March 1, 2008 © 2007 SAGE Publications
A Comparison of Two Pain Measures for Asian American Cancer Patients
The University of Texas at Austin
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: 98shj98{at}gmail.com.
=.85 to .97). Correlation coefficients of the item analyses are .12 to .88 for the MPQ-SF and .44 to .90 for the BPI-SF. Two factors are extracted for both instruments. Correlations between pain scores and the usage of pain medications are low for the MPQ-SF (r =.23 to .33) and moderate for the BPI-SF (r =.40 to .42). Results indicate that among Asian Americans, both pain scales are internally consistent, some items in each are redundant, and the BPI-SF is more valid than the MPQ-SF.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||

=.85 to .97). Correlation coefficients of the item analyses are .12 to .88 for the MPQ-SF and .44 to .90 for the BPI-SF. Two factors are extracted for both instruments. Correlations between pain scores and the usage of pain medications are low for the MPQ-SF (r =.23 to .33) and moderate for the BPI-SF (r =.40 to .42). Results indicate that among Asian Americans, both pain scales are internally consistent, some items in each are redundant, and the BPI-SF is more valid than the MPQ-SF.